In a major development in the ongoing legal battle over a tragic construction-site accident in Jogeshwari, Mumbai, the Bombay High Court has deferred the hearing on builder Bhavesh Gulabchand Sanghrajka’s pre-arrest bail plea to November 27, 2025.
On the morning of 8th October 2025, Sanskruti Amin, a 22-year-old banker, was walking to work near her Jogeshwari East home when a cement block fell from an under-construction building onto her head.
The concerned building is being developed by Shraddha Lifestyle LLP, in which Sanghrajka is a partner.
She was rushed to a nearby hospital, where she was declared dead on arrival.
Legal Action & Charges
Meghwadi police registered a First Information Report (FIR) under culpable homicide not amounting to murder-under section 105 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, and common intention-section 3(5)-naming Sanghrajka and others associated with the construction firm.
According to the FIR, the safety norms at the construction site were allegedly not followed rigorously.
After the accident, police arrested site engineer Shambhu Kumar Paswan and site manager Gaurav Sondagar.
Meanwhile, Sanskruti’s father has been vocally demanding the arrest of the builder too, arguing that the structural negligence was on a greater scale.
Bail Plea & Court Findings
He applied for an anticipatory bail, but on October 29, his plea was rejected by a sessions court. The court seriously observed that temporary pedestrian protection ‘arcade’, which is mandatory under high-rise construction safety norms, was not installed around the building.
Photographs before the court reportedly showed torn safety nets-the judge described them as inadequate for ensuring pedestrian safety.
The court also suggested that custodial interrogation may be necessary since the investigation was still in its preliminary stages.
When Sanghrajka approached the Bombay High Court seeking protection, the Single Bench granted interim protection from coercive action (i.e., arrest) till November 27.
The court agreed to defer a detailed hearing on the pre-arrest bail plea while noting that the public prosecutor had sought more time to bring an expert report on whether adequate safety measures were indeed taken at the site.
Safety Violations in Construction: Serious safety lapses in construction, such as failure to erect pedestrian arcs and inadequate safety nets, are brought out in this case.
Legal Precedent: A decision on the bail plea can set a precedent for how future construction accident cases will be dealt with, particularly when negligence leads to the loss of life.
Regulatory Attention: It highlights the need for stronger enforcement of building safety norms, especially in dense and high-rise redevelopment zones of Mumbai. Public Pressure: The family of the victim and people in the local community are pressing hard for accountability, not just limited to site-level staff but also top-level developers. What’s Next November 27 Hearing: The High Court will take up the bail plea again after the interim period ends. Expert Report: The court is expected to examine the expert’s findings in deciding whether to arrest Sanghrajka or not. Investigation Progress: Depending on the court’s decision, this case might be escalated to a full trial and could result in additional charges or greater scrutiny on construction practices. This incident has sent shockwaves in Mumbai’s real estate, legal, and civic circles because, other than the loss of a young life, it raises certain critical questions regarding construction safety, developer accountability, and public space protection during redevelopment.
